ATTENTION

BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!

INFORMATION:

YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420

WHATSAPP US ON  08137701720

SUBARACHNOID BLOCK FOR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE: A COMPARISON OF THE BLOCK CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN 0.5% ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL AND 0.5% ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE ALONE

ABSTRACT

Spinal anaesthesia is commonly administered for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). It

is known to have a better outcome by enhancing early diagnosis and prompt treatment of

complications associated with TURP in this group of patients with increased prevalence of co

morbid and degenerative diseases like hypertension, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis. This

study was aimed at comparing the block characteristics of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with

fentanyl versus 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine alone during spinal anaesthesia for TURP

operations.

After obtaining the approval of the Ethics and Research Committee of the University of Port

Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, 60 male patients aged 40 – 90 years with American

Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II scheduled for elective TURP were

recruited into the prospective randomized double blind comparative study and allocated into 2

groups (A and B) using coded papers in an envelope. Following a spinal tap, intrathecal

injection in Group A (n = 30), 2.0 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with fentanyl 25 µg (0.5

ml), and in Group B (n = 30), 2.0 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine with 0.9% saline solution

0.5 ml was administered. The sensory and motor block characteristics, quality of analgesia

during and after the surgery, haemodynamic data, and side effects were assessed and recorded.

The patients were observed until the level of sensory block was S1 dermatome and the Bromage

score was 0.

The differences in the mean age, weight, height, BMI distributions were not statistically

significant in Group A and Group B and the p values were p=0.78, p=0.43, p=0.42 and p=0.67.

The median maximal sensory block height was statistically significant in the two groups of

patients, p=0.02. Group A had a median maximum sensory block height of T4, while Group B

had a median maximum sensory block height of T6. The number of patients requesting for

postoperative analgesia in Group A were 21 (80%), compared to Group B 28 (100%), and the

difference was statistically significant (p=0.04) in both groups.

The mean heart rate, mean systolic blood pressure, and mean diastolic blood pressure were

observed to be lower at 35 min in Group B (74.74±5.91 bpm, 121.23±6.65 mmHg, and

68.89±3.92 mmHg) compared to Group A (82.08±5.45 bpm, 131.39±4.19 mmHg and

83.08±3.51 mmHg). The changes were statistically significant, and the p values were p=0.03,

p=0.01, and p=0.00 respectively. However, the change in the mean mean arterial blood pressure

at 35 min in Group A (93.69±3.39 mmHg) and Group B (95.86±5.65 mmHg) was not

statistically significant (p=0.25).

Bradycardia and hypotension were more in Group B (17.85% and 14.28%) compared to Group

A (11.53% and 7.69%) patients and they were satisfactorily treated with intravenous atropine

0.6mg and saline solution respectively.

It was thus concluded that isobaric bupivacaine with fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in TURP

patients provides adequate sensory block, and more stable haemodynamic profile, but with

prolongation of motor block compared with isobaric bupivacaine alone.

HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)

After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to

08068231953 or 08168759420

(1)    Your project topics

(2)     Email Address

(3)     Payment Name

(4)    Teller Number

We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert

BANK ACCOUNTS

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 0046579864

Bank: GTBank.

OR

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 3139283609

Bank: FIRST BANK

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:

08068231953 or 08168759420

AFFILIATE LINKS:

myeasyproject.com.ng

easyprojectmaterials.com

easyprojectmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterial.net.ng

easyprojectmaterial.net.ng

projectmaterials.com.ng

googleprojectsng.blogspot.com

myprojectsng.blogspot.com.ng

https://projectmaterialsng.blogspot.com.ng/
https://foreasyprojectmaterials.blogspot.com.ng/
https://mypostumes.blogspot.com.ng/
https://myeasymaterials.blogspot.com.ng/
https://eazyprojectsmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/
https://easzprojectmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *