ATTENTION

BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!

INFORMATION:

YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420

WHATSAPP US ON  08137701720

TRANSARTERIAL AXILLARY PLEXUS BLOCK FOR OPERATIONS ON AND BOW THE ELBOW: COMPARISON OF TWO INJECTION TECHNIQUES WHERE THERE IS NO NERVE STIMULATOR

ABSTRACT

Surgical procedures on the lower arm are quite suited for brachial plexus anaesthesia. The

trend in my centre, however, has been to administer general anaesthesia for operations on and

below the elbow. The axillary brachial plexus block avoids the problems of endotracheal

intubation and other general anaeathesia-related adverse effects and provides improved early

postoperative pain relief. The transarterial technique for axillary plexus block enables local

anaesthetic to be deposited immediately adjacent to the axillary artery and in close proximity to

the individual nerves of the brachial plexus within the axillary sheath. It has been proven to be

efficacious and safe. In a resource-poor setting like ours, where advanced technical equipment like

ultrasound machine and nerve stimulator are lacking, there is a need to have an effective and safe

technique of axillary brachial plexus block for lower arm operations. Hence, the evaluation of two

different techniques of transarterial axillary brachial plexus blocks.

This is a prospective, randomized, double blind comparative trial, which was approved by

the Health Research Ethics Committee of National Hospital, Abuja. American Society of

Anaesthesiologists physical status classes I and II subjects aged between 18 and 60 years drawn

from both sexes scheduled for elective procedures on the elbow, forearm, wrist and the hand

participated in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive a single (posterior)

injection, group A (n=35) or double (posterior and anterior) injections, group B (n=35) of 40 mL

pre-mixed solution containing 20 mL 1% lidocaine with adrenaline 1: 200,000 and 20 mL 0.25%

plain bupivacaine into the axillary sheath. Patients in the posterior group (group A) received the

entire solution posterior to the axillary artery while those in the double group (group B) received

20 mL each of same local anaesthetic mixture, posterior and anterior to the axillary artery. A

multiparameter patient monitor (Mindray BeneView T5) was attached and baseline vital signs

were measured. A venous access was established in each patient and an intravenous infusion of

lactated Ringers solution was commenced, and, transarterial axillary brachial plexus block was

established. In all the patients, the success rate, performance time, time to block readiness for

surgery, total anaesthetic time, need for rescue analgesics, and occurrence of adverse events were

determined.

A total of 70 patients were randomized equally into group A and group B. The socio

demographic characteristics and ASA status of patients in both groups were similar. The groups

did not differ significantly in success rate (group B 91% versus group A 88%, p=0.434). Time for

block performance was prolonged (9.20 ± 2.56 minutes versus 8.06 ± 1.83 minutes, p=0.035) and

block readiness for surgery was shortened (23.43 ± 4.82 minutes versus 26.18 ± 4.93 minutes,

p=0.022) in group B but total anaesthesia-related time was similar in the two groups (p=0.204).

The onset of sensory block was hastened in group B (double injection) in the median nerve

(p=0.042), musculocutaneous nerve (p=0.019), medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm (p=0.001)

and the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm (p=0.004). Also, the duration of sensory analgesia

(375.00 ± 62.84 minutes versus 329.03 ± 51.08 minutes, p=0.002) and motor block (346.88 ±

45.04 minutes versus 319.35 ± 47.46 minutes, p=0.021) was longer in group B (double injection

technique) compared to group A (single injection). The occurrence of tourniquet pain (p=0.232),

accidental paraesthesia (p=0.274), intra-operative opioid use (p=0.403), and conversion to general

anaesthesia (p=0.690) was similar in both groups. There were no significant adverse events and

patients in both groups expressed high level of satisfaction with the technique of anaesthesia.

The study showed that the single and double injection transarterial techniques of axillary

plexus block with 40 mL 1% lidocaine in 1: 200,000 adrenaline and 0.25% plain bupivacaine

mixture ensured similar clinical success rate with minimal side effects. The double injection

technique results showed longer duration of sensory analgesia, thus, may be a more favourable

technique for surgery on and below the elbow.

HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)

After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to

08068231953 or 08168759420

(1)    Your project topics

(2)     Email Address

(3)     Payment Name

(4)    Teller Number

We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert

BANK ACCOUNTS

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 0046579864

Bank: GTBank.

OR

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 3139283609

Bank: FIRST BANK

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:

08068231953 or 08168759420

AFFILIATE LINKS:

myeasyproject.com.ng

easyprojectmaterials.com

easyprojectmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterial.net.ng

easyprojectmaterial.net.ng

projectmaterials.com.ng

googleprojectsng.blogspot.com

myprojectsng.blogspot.com.ng

https://projectmaterialsng.blogspot.com.ng/
https://foreasyprojectmaterials.blogspot.com.ng/
https://mypostumes.blogspot.com.ng/
https://myeasymaterials.blogspot.com.ng/
https://eazyprojectsmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/
https://easzprojectmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *